<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content For Links &amp; Go Compare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linkbuildr.com/content-for-links-go-compare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/content-for-links-go-compare/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:42:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/content-for-links-go-compare/comment-page-1/#comment-3042</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbuildr.com/?p=2363#comment-3042</guid>
		<description>The concept seems great, but it was executed poorly by Go Compare.  When you get a large company doing work like this, it&#039;s always a crap shoot.  They have limited time and resources, and the faster they can shovel the money in and the work out, the better.  It doesn&#039;t bode well for your site. 
 
I took this approach a few months back and it has reaped huge rewards for me.  Instead of link trading, I have written articles for other sites, and they include a link back to my site at the end of the article.  These have been highly ranked websites IN MY NICHE, and they still link to my site because the link and article is in the niche, but is abit off topic of their site which they do not have any content yet.  It&#039;s a win-win for both sites, and just one article put me on the front page from 5 pages in the serp&#039;s. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concept seems great, but it was executed poorly by Go Compare.  When you get a large company doing work like this, it&#039;s always a crap shoot.  They have limited time and resources, and the faster they can shovel the money in and the work out, the better.  It doesn&#039;t bode well for your site. </p>
<p>I took this approach a few months back and it has reaped huge rewards for me.  Instead of link trading, I have written articles for other sites, and they include a link back to my site at the end of the article.  These have been highly ranked websites IN MY NICHE, and they still link to my site because the link and article is in the niche, but is abit off topic of their site which they do not have any content yet.  It&#039;s a win-win for both sites, and just one article put me on the front page from 5 pages in the serp&#039;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matchmaking</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/content-for-links-go-compare/comment-page-1/#comment-2051</link>
		<dc:creator>Matchmaking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbuildr.com/?p=2363#comment-2051</guid>
		<description>Mass mailing is a big no no! Just doesn&#039;t give a professional impression. If you send the mails one by one instead, that could work i think. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mass mailing is a big no no! Just doesn&#039;t give a professional impression. If you send the mails one by one instead, that could work i think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Optimizing tips</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/content-for-links-go-compare/comment-page-1/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>Optimizing tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbuildr.com/?p=2363#comment-2049</guid>
		<description>This method above is getting really popular with SEO.  People say article marketing is dead...this is just another form of it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This method above is getting really popular with SEO.  People say article marketing is dead&#8230;this is just another form of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: linkbuildr</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/content-for-links-go-compare/comment-page-1/#comment-2030</link>
		<dc:creator>linkbuildr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 22:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbuildr.com/?p=2363#comment-2030</guid>
		<description>Well I&#039;m not sure how you&#039;re building links but perhaps diversify? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#039;m not sure how you&#039;re building links but perhaps diversify?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  Frisco Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/content-for-links-go-compare/comment-page-1/#comment-2029</link>
		<dc:creator> Frisco Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 20:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbuildr.com/?p=2363#comment-2029</guid>
		<description>I went from one set of keywords to another, and then added another.  I am now taking some heat off the site for a couple days, I went from 300 to 3000 in one month with a mix of 5 different keyword strings.  I kind of think google will slap me if I don&#039;t slow down.  What is your advice? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went from one set of keywords to another, and then added another.  I am now taking some heat off the site for a couple days, I went from 300 to 3000 in one month with a mix of 5 different keyword strings.  I kind of think google will slap me if I don&#039;t slow down.  What is your advice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miami web design</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/content-for-links-go-compare/comment-page-1/#comment-2028</link>
		<dc:creator>miami web design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbuildr.com/?p=2363#comment-2028</guid>
		<description>yeah , Go compare emails had started a great debate . I don&#039;t think that big companies should email like it . I worked for some big companies but we did it under cover not revealing about companies  But yes it generated a lot of publicity for gocompare and some links without giving any content Lolz </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah , Go compare emails had started a great debate . I don&#039;t think that big companies should email like it . I worked for some big companies but we did it under cover not revealing about companies  But yes it generated a lot of publicity for gocompare and some links without giving any content Lolz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
