<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>High Quality Link Building Services &#38; Social Media Marketing &#187; Black Hat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linkbuildr.com/black-hat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com</link>
	<description>We&#039;re link building consultants who provide a high quality, white hat link building service. We also do social media marketing an branding!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:30:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Blog Network Outed &amp; Google Responds</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/blog-network-outed-google-responds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbuildr.com/blog-network-outed-google-responds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 00:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbuildr.com/?p=8493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was doing some answering on Google Webmaster Central this morning when I spotted a thread where someone outed a link network publicly. This should be a little alarming to those blackhatter&#8217;s out there who do the same thing and don&#8217;t cover their tracks. What&#8217;s even more strange to see is an actual Google employee &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbuildr.com/blog-network-outed-google-responds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fortune 500 Company + SEnuke = Disaster</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/fortune-500-company-senuke-disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbuildr.com/fortune-500-company-senuke-disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackhat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senuke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbuildr.com/?p=7345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before we get into this quick post I&#8217;ll state this is in by no means a bash to SEnuke, but more of a lesson when hiring an in-house SEO. A lot of the link building tactics used in the software are 100% link schemes, and are going to eventually get you in trouble. However, it &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbuildr.com/fortune-500-company-senuke-disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dilbert Caught Buying Links &#8211; Google Punishes!</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/dilbert-caught-buying-links-google-punishes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbuildr.com/dilbert-caught-buying-links-google-punishes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dilbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbuildr.com/?p=7320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks To: Dilbert.com For The Comic!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbuildr.com/dilbert-caught-buying-links-google-punishes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buy Google +1 Votes? How Long Before It&#8217;s Gamed?</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/buy-google-1-votes-how-long-before-its-gamed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbuildr.com/buy-google-1-votes-how-long-before-its-gamed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google +1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google plus one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote buying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbuildr.com/?p=7261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently adding the Google +1 button to my site, and while I&#8217;m not too happy about adding another bloody button to the long list of ones here, it had to be done. I&#8217;ve yet had to see any positive results, or notice a change within my Google SERPs in regards to this new &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbuildr.com/buy-google-1-votes-how-long-before-its-gamed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donations As A Link Building Tactic? Be Careful</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/donations-as-a-link-building-tactics-be-careful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbuildr.com/donations-as-a-link-building-tactics-be-careful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 16:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link building tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link penalty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbuildr.com/?p=6778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent thread in GWC made me remember that donations are an often tactic used by companies with a lot of link money to burn. They&#8217;re usually pretty safe from Google&#8217;s clutches, but they&#8217;re also a huge risk. I was doing some backlink analysis for someone in a thread who had got stung with a &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbuildr.com/donations-as-a-link-building-tactics-be-careful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panda Update Is Working For Us Against OneWayLinkBuilder.com</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/panda-update-is-working-for-us-against-onewaylinkbuilder-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbuildr.com/panda-update-is-working-for-us-against-onewaylinkbuilder-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google panda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbuildr.com/?p=6386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OneWayLinkBuilder.com has been scraping not only our blog content, but Vertical Measures blog as well. I&#8217;ve asked many times through many streams and nothing was done about it, well, not until Panda anywho. We&#8217;ve implemented Google&#8217;s original source meta tags, blocked the scrapers via .htaccess but that didn&#8217;t stop them there. They take our content &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbuildr.com/panda-update-is-working-for-us-against-onewaylinkbuilder-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paid Links in 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/paid-links-in-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbuildr.com/paid-links-in-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 18:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackhat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbuildr.com/?p=5688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never thought I&#8217;d be writing another post about paid links, especially in 2011. Talk about beating a dead horse, resurrecting it and then beating it to death again. You can find our team helping people for free on Google&#8217;s Webmaster Central, and it is the reason I&#8217;ve decided to blab on the topic. Almost &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbuildr.com/paid-links-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forbes.com Caught With Paid Links Again?</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/forbes-com-caught-with-paid-links-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbuildr.com/forbes-com-caught-with-paid-links-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 01:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forbes.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbuildr.com/?p=5458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I&#8217;ll usually refrain from posting about specific sites and problems, this is already made public thanks to Google Webmaster Central. Since JCPenny was getting some flack from Google and the web this last week, it looks like other Fortune 500&#8242;s are being treated equally. While a site like Forbes.com does have what to appear &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbuildr.com/forbes-com-caught-with-paid-links-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Lift A Google Penalty</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/how-to-lift-a-google-penalty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbuildr.com/how-to-lift-a-google-penalty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt cutts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbuildr.com/?p=5454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a great new Webmaster Help video with Matt Cutts talking about lifting a Google penalty. A lot of people, and I see it in their help forums a lot, think the only way is to have it manually reviewed. It&#8217;s great to hear that you can fix things and let their spiders fix you &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbuildr.com/how-to-lift-a-google-penalty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JCPenny Caught With Paid Links?</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildr.com/jcpenny-caught-with-paid-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkbuildr.com/jcpenny-caught-with-paid-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 23:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Black Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jcpenny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkbuildr.com/?p=5417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just enjoyed reading the long and well done report by the NT Times on the black hat hi-jinx JCPenny has been tangled up in. I don&#8217;t need to chat much about it as they went 5 pages deep into uncovering what was going on. JCPenny, by the looks of their Alexa, did quite well &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkbuildr.com/jcpenny-caught-with-paid-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

